NIST Finalizes Guidelines for Evaluating ‘Differential Privacy’ Guarantees to De-Identify Data

 How can we glean useful insights from databases containing confidential information while protecting the privacy of the individuals whose data is contained within? Differential privacy, a way of defining privacy in a mathematically rigorous manner, can help strike this balance. Newly updated guidelines from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) are intended to assist organizations with making the most of differential privacy’s capabilities.

Differential privacy, or DP, is a privacy-enhancing technology used in data analytics. In recent years, it has been successfully deployed by large technology corporations and the U.S. Census Bureau. While it is a relatively mature technology, a lack of standards can create challenges for its effective use and adoption. For example, a DP software vendor may offer guarantees that if its software is used, it will be impossible to re-identify an individual whose data appears in the database. NIST’s new guidelines aim to help organizations understand and think more consistently about such claims.






Differential privacy works by adding random “noise” to the data in a way that obscures the identity of the individuals but keeps the database useful overall as a source of statistical information. However, noise applied in the wrong way can jeopardize privacy or render the data less useful. 

To help users avoid these pitfalls, the document includes interactive tools, flow charts, and even sample computer code that can aid in decision-making and show how varying noise levels can affect privacy and data usability. 

“Small groups in the data of any sort tend to stand out more, so you may need to add more noise to protect their privacy,” Howarth said. 

While the document is not intended to be a complete primer on differential privacy, Howarth said that it provides a robust reading list of other publications that can help practitioners get up to speed on the topic. The guidelines also cover the sorts of problems that the technology could work with and how to implement it in those situations. 

“With DP there are many gray areas,” he said. “There is no simple answer for how to balance privacy with usefulness. You must answer that every time you apply DP to data. This publication can help you navigate that space.” 


More info: 




_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 
  

Social Media:







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Large Language Models and Vector Databases for News Recommendations

Image
  Large Language Models   (LLMs) generated a global buzz in the machine learning community with recent releases of generative AI tools such as Chat-GPT, Bard, and others alike. One of the core ideas behind these solutions is to compute a numerical representation of unstructured data (such as texts and images) and find similarities between these representations. However, taking all of these concepts into a production environment has its own set of machine learning engineering challenges: How to generate these representations quickly? How to store them in a proper database? How to quickly compute similarities for production environments? In this article, I introduce two open-source solutions that aim to solve these questions: Sentence Transformers  [1] : an embedding generation technique based on textual information and; Qdrant : a vector database capable of storing embeddings and providing an easy interface to query them. These tools are applied to NPR [2], a News Portal R...
Read more

Is Palantir creating a national database of US citizens?

Image
According to its website, Palantir makes "products for human-driven analysis of real-world data." On May 30, 2025,  The New York Times published an article   titled "Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans," detailing a supposed combined effort between the U.S. federal government and the data software company Palantir to centralize data on American citizens. Data privacy advocates did not take the news well, calling it "dystopian" and a massive invasion of privacy. Four days later, Palantir posted a statement to X responding to the article, calling the reporting " blatantly untrue" because "Palantir never collects data to unlawfully surveil Americans, and our Foundry platform employs granular security protections." On June 9, 2025, the company followed up with a long blog post on X titled " Correcting the Record: Responses to the May 30, 2025 New York Times Article on Palantir," which aimed to fact-check the article....
Read more

NIH autism database announcement raises concerns among researchers

Image
A new research initiative from the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) seeks to gather and analyze multiple autism-related datasets to better understand the underlying causes of the condition. Letters of intent are due tomorrow, but the project’s atypical call for applications has autism scientists divided on whether or not to participate. The Autism Data Science Initiative provides $50 million for an anticipated 10 to 25 projects, according to the 27 May announcement. The funding opportunity uses an Other Transaction (OT) funding mechanism, which tends to be implemented when, among other reasons, a project is expected to evolve over time, more collaboration is required from the NIH or nontraditional research groups are involved, according to an NIH website. For a field that has recently seen budget cuts, some researchers are welcoming the opportunity for funding, says   Helen Tager-Flusberg , director of the Center for Autism Research Excellence at Bosto...
Read more